<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>In Pursuit of Mysteries - Latest Comments in Firefox 2K and Shipping</title><link>http://inpursuitofmysteries.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:29:20 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Firefox 2K and Shipping</title><link>http://www.arcanology.com/2008/06/17/firefox-2k-and-shipping/#comment-1265899</link><description>Running Firefox 3 on Win2k is great! To me one of the selling points of Firefox is that it runs on older OSes, reducing the need for upgrading older machines and thereby saving money!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course if you think that is something, I have had  Firefox 2.0.0.x running under NT 3.51 - for which there was NEVER a native 32-bit version of IE available. Screen shot: &lt;a href="http://toastytech.com/guis/ff2nt351.png" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://toastytech.com/guis/ff2nt351.png&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:29:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefox 2K and Shipping</title><link>http://www.arcanology.com/2008/06/17/firefox-2k-and-shipping/#comment-1265898</link><description>Congratulations from a long time user (we're talking, *Mozilla* 0.9 era, and NN before that), and thank you for a wonderful browser.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Lawson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 22:55:54 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>